To further underline the point I am making here, the Commonwealth Electoral Act No. 31 of 1962 states in its foreword that it is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- “An Act to give to Aboriginal Natives of Australia the right to enrol and to vote as Electors of the Commonwealth, and to provide for certain offences in relation thereto. Also, most importantly;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Section 159 of the Principal Act. is amended by adding at the end thereof the words, “or with the free exercise by an Aboriginal Native of Australia of his choice whether or not to enrol as an elector “<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
There are two points one should note here:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- The word “native” is used to explicitly define the “type” of Aboriginal, ie, not a person of mixed race.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- The act was deferential in that native Aborigines could opt not to enrol to vote as opposed to Australian citizens who were not native Aborigines and were therefore compelled to vote.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
With every Referendum there is required to be a “Yes” and “No” case provided to the Australian electors. The 1967 Referendum was multi-faceted, ie, it did not just deal with the counting of Aboriginal Natives in the Census. I have attached a copy of the original public briefing on the various matters to be decided by the 1967 Referendum. (This has been largely lost down the “memory hole” when Googling about the 1967 Referendum – such searches giving only a distorted version of what actually applied at that time.) Once again the explanatory notes refer to Aboriginal Natives saying:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“The second proposed alteration is the repeal of Section 127 of the Constitution. That section reads:
‘In reckoning the numbers of the people of the Commonwealth, or of a State or other part of the Commonwealth, aboriginal natives<\/strong> shall not be counted.’\u201d (I should point out that the word “Aboriginal” is not a noun but an adjective that has, through common usage, become a noun through the shortening of “Aboriginal People” or “Aboriginal Natives”. When the word “Aboriginal” was used in 1967 in the context of amendments to Section 127, it therefore meant “Aboriginal Native”.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe explanatory note in this public briefing went on to say (and this puts the situation into its proper context for that day and age! unlike the Googled results one obtains now):<\/p>\n\n\n\n
” Why was this provision included in the Constitution In 1900? Well, there were serious practical difficulties In counting the Aboriginal[Native]s in those days. They were dispersed, and nomadic. Communications in inland Australia were poor, and frequently non-existent. Today the situation is very different and counting is practicable.” (Note that I have inserted [native] in the verbiage and I have to wonder if, even in that day and age, there were malignant Fabian forces at work to muddy the issue by using the adjective “Aboriginal” rather than fully qualifying the noun by saying “Aboriginal Native” as was the case in the original Section 127, crafted circa 1900.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When the Australian people agreed to allow the Federal Government to make laws specifically for Aborigines, they did so in the belief that it only applied to Aboriginal Natives. The Australian people did not knowingly give the Federal Government the right to make laws specifically for “half-castes” and by implication persons who had a lesser degree of Aboriginality in their genetic makeup. Also “Aboriginal Race” was synonymous with “Aboriginal Native”. It meant an Aboriginal whose racial makeup was not adulterated by another race. Further to this, the implications of agreeing to this change in the constitution were never revealed to the Australian people in the “No” argument. This I believe was a deliberate deception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As a consequence of this, all laws which the Federal Government has subsequently made after 1967 for persons, who were not by definition of Alfred Deakin, Aboriginal Natives, are unconstitutional and discriminate against all other Australians who do not have Aboriginal genes in their makeup.<\/u><\/em> My understanding is that this matter of racially based welfare has already gone to the High Court and Labor leaning Justices opined that the amended Constitution gave the Federal Government the right to institute a system of welfare that was discriminatory. I don’t believe my argument, put here, was ever presented to the Justices because the Government of the day was half-hearted in its objections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Referendums, just like the 1967 Referendum, can put to the Australian people multiple proposals. I believe there should be a second proposal to amend the Constitution put to the Australian people and it is one that would be very difficult to argue against.<\/u><\/em> That proposal should be:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“An amendment to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia to stipulate that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“No Government, nor any Government agency, at Federal, State, Territory or Local level within the Commonwealth of Australia may make laws or construct regulations that discriminate on the basis of a citizen’s race or gender. To this end, all citizens, regardless of race or gender, shall be treated exactly the same under the law and shall be entitled to whatever benefits their circumstances might entitle under those laws and regulations.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If this amendment is made to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, it prevents High Court Justices from making law to suit their own ideological preferences. Australia has already seen a gross abuse of Judicial Power in the Mabo decision where the High Court Justices disregarded the long held and self-evident principle of “Terra Nullius” effectively making law that has had a profound and adverse effect on the rights of common Australian people and the Australian economy. That ruling too, must be reversed. The first step to that process is the prohibition of the Government discriminating on the basis of race or gender.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For your consideration and action as you see appropriate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/kevinloughrey.com.au\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/aussieflyers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Untitled.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n